This paper studies an information control problem where an Expert (center) structures messages for an Agent by partitioning the set of possible world states. We show that the consistency condition — mutual benefit of truthful reporting — ensures reliable communication without repeated interactions. For the considered model, we formalize the conditions for the existence of consistent partitions under different degrees of conflict of interest. Using the example of four states and a conflict of interest parameter of 0.5, we prove that truthful reporting maximizes the expert’s payoff. The analysis of all possible partitions reveals critical dependencies of the expert’s payoff on the partition structure.