This article aims to compare two risk assessment methods: EBIOS and FSTEC. EBIOS is published by the National Cybersecurity Agency of France (ANSSI), while FSTEC originates from Russia. Both methods are used relatively locally, but prove capable in France and Russia respectively. This article briefly describes those methods and compares them. The following research is subjective, and the author compares those methods based on his personal preferences, since no other such comparisons are known. During the research, both methods are briefly described and compared since both have appropriate pros and cons, while both may perform better in a particular situation. It leads to the conclusion that the application of both such methods can prove effective, and the main goal is to choose the most suitable approach for a particular situation.