We study the degree of individual and coalitional manipulability of q-Paretian social choice rules under Impartial Culture. Manipulability is defined as a situation, when an agent or a coalition, which consists of some agents, misrepresents her/their preferences to obtain a better outcome of the social choice rule. We study a class of q-Paretian social choice rules, which consists of four rules: Strong q-Paretian simple majority rule, Strong q-Paretian plurality rule, Strongest q-Paretian simple majority rule, and Condorcet practical rule. For the cases of 3, 4, and 5 alternatives and for the cases from 3 to 100 agents, we use computer modeling to calculate a number of manipulability indices. We provide the analysis of the results for different cases.