Thirty two-stage superposition choice procedures which sequentially apply two choice procedures in compliance with superposition principle are studied. We define which of them satisfy given normative conditions, showing how a final choice is changed due to the changes of preferences or a set of feasible alternatives. A theorem is proved showing which normative conditions are satisfied for two-stage choice procedures based on different scoring rules, rules, using majority relation, value function and tournament matrix. A complexity of two-stage choice procedures as well as its runtime on real data are evaluated.